TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGIES
Institute of Molecular Biology, Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Azerbaijan
Department of Agronomy, PMAS Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, 46300, Pakistan
For correspondence: zainulsajjad.edu@gmail.com
Zain ul Sajjad: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8354-8134
The challenge of significantly increasing food demand while reducing greenhouse gas emissions represents a two-pronged challenge for sorghum production, but the relationship between agronomic intensity and carbon efficiency remains unresolved. The absence of integrated multi-season analyses limits the development of climate-smart management strategies. In this research paper, the researcher examined the impact of graded input levels on grain yield, biomass production, and the carbon footprint of sorghum under semi-arid conditions. A randomized complete block experiment was conducted across two consecutive growing seasons using low-, medium-, and high-input regimes, and fertilizer consumption, mechanization, and agrochemical inputs were measured. The absolute and yield-scaled carbon footprints were calculated using life cycle assessment, and linear mixed-effects models were employed to study treatment effects across seasons. Intensification increased grain yield (3.12 to 5.44 t ha⁻¹) and above-ground biomass (7.73 to 13.63 t ha⁻¹) significantly (p < 0.001), whereas absolute carbon emissions increased from 891 to 1645 kg CO₂-eq ha⁻¹. The carbon footprint scaled by yield remained relatively constant at 286–303 kg CO₂-eq ha⁻¹, indicating a structural relationship between biomass formation and emissions. These results indicate that intensification shifts the production curve along a predictable yield-emission trajectory without altering carbon efficiency, offering practical conclusions for sustainable intensification practices in semi-arid cereal production.
Adlan C.A., Hanssen S.V., Luchtenbelt H., Hendriks C., Doelman J.C., Stehfest E., Wicke B. (2025) Emissions footprints of agriculture around the world 1970–2020: Decreasing land conversion, regional exceptions and increasing management intensity. Global Change Biology, 31(10): e70528.
Bareille F., Chakir R. (2024) Structural identification of weather impacts on crop yields: Disentangling agronomic from adaptation effects. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 106(3): 989–1019.
Bhattacharya A. (2022). Effect of low temperature on dry matter, partitioning, and seed yield: A review. In: Physiological Processes in Plants Under Low Temperature Stress, pp. 629–734.
Biswas J.C., Haque M.M., Hossain M.B., Maniruzzaman M., Zahan T., Rahman M.M., Hossain A. (2022) Seasonal variations in grain yield, greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration for maize cultivation in Bangladesh. Sustainability, 14(15): 9144; doi: 10.3390/su14159144
Costa Jr.C., Tedeschi L.O., Gonzalez-Quintero R., Arango J., Burkart S., Grosjean G., Rao I.M. (2025) South America's pasture intensification can increase beef production, reduce emissions by 30% and mitigate warming from methane by 2050. Scientific Reports, 15(1): 35734; doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-35734-x
Farooq M.S., Uzair M., Raza A., Habib M., Xu Y., Yousuf M., Ramzan Khan M. (2022) Uncovering the research gaps to alleviate the negative impacts of climate change on food security: A review. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13: 927535; doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.927535
Fu H., Xie X., Zhao K., Chen D., Hu S., Li Y., Shi L. (2024) Tracking social-economic system nitrogen flow in China for emissions reduction and efficiency improvement. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 207: 107661; doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107661
Hadebe S.T., Modi A.T., Mabhaudhi T. (2017) Drought tolerance and water use of cereal crops: A focus on sorghum as a food security crop in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 203(3): 177–191; doi: 10.1111/jac.12191
Hajiyeva S.T. (2025) Current aspects of small and medium entrepreneurship development in the agro-industrial sector of Azerbaijan. Science, Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems, 8(2): 144-167
Han K., Li X., Jia L., Yu D., Xu W., Chen H., Liu P. (2024) Optimizing tillage and fertilization practices to improve the carbon footprint and energy efficiency of wheat-maize cropping systems. Journal of Integrative Agriculture.
Harrison M.T., Cullen B.R., Mayberry D.E., Cowie A.L., Bilotto F., Badgery W.B., Eckard R.J. (2021) Carbon myopia: The urgent need for integrated social, economic and environmental action in the livestock sector. Global Change Biology, 27(22): 5726–5761; doi: 10.1111/gcb.15816
Henry B., Murphy B., Cowie A. (2018). Sustainable land management for environmental benefits and food security: A synthesis report for the GEF. Global Environment Facility, Washington, DC, USA.
Hossain M.S., Islam M.N., Rahman M.M., Mostofa M.G., Khan M.A.R. (2022) Sorghum: A prospective crop for climatic vulnerability, food and nutritional security. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 8: 100300; doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100300
Idris S.A., Saleh N., Mikailu, Bashir L.R. (2026) Impact of climate change on agriculture in Agatu Local Government Area, Benue State. Science, Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems, 9(2): 1–10; doi: 10.56334/sei/9.2.21
Infante-Amate J., Aguilera E. (2024) Beyond fossil fuels: Considering land-based emissions reshapes the carbon intensity of modern economic growth (Spain, 1860–2017). Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 57(4): 226–241; doi: 10.1080/01615440.2024.2331315
Jagadesh M., Dash M., Singh S.K., Kumari A., Verma K.K. (2024) Carbon footprints in agriculture: Challenges, mitigation strategies, and future prospects. In: Carbon Footprint Assessments: Case Studies & Best Practices, pp. 17–43. Springer Nature Switzerland: doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-58140-0_2
Johnston A., Hochachka W.M., Strimas-Mackey M.E., Ruiz Gutierrez V., Robinson O.J., Miller E.T., Fink D. (2021) Analytical guidelines to increase the value of community science data: An example using eBird data to estimate species distributions. Diversity and Distributions, 27(7): 1265–1277; doi: 10.1111/ddi.13271
Li X., Li X., Liu T., Yin H., Fu H., Luo Y., Chen Z. (2024) Strategies for improving crop comprehensive benefits via a decision-making system based on machine learning in the rice-rape, rice-wheat and rice-garlic rotation systems in Southwest China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 23(9): 2970–2988; doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.027
Lin S., Liu K., Lemke R. (2025) Assessing cropping system effects on carbon footprint on the Canadian prairies. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 89(2): e70039; doi: 10.1002/saj2.70039
Linquist B., Van Groenigen K.J., Adviento-Borbe M.A., Pittelkow C., Van Kessel C. (2012) An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops. Global Change Biology, 18(1): 194–209; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02502.x
McDonald H., Gardiner J., Scheid A., Siemons A., Fallasch F., Scheffler M., Wiegmann K. (2025) Temporary carbon units from carbon farming and EU agri-food climate policy. Assessment of risks, opportunities, and alternatives for promoting temporary carbon sequestration. Ecologic Institute, Berlin.
Monteiro A., Santos S. (2022) Sustainable approach to weed management: The role of precision weed management. Agronomy, 12(1): 118; doi: 10.3390/agronomy12010118
Moore R.D., MacDonald R.J. (2024) James Buttle Review: Quantifying the influence of forestry and forest disturbance on stream temperature: Methodologies and challenges. Hydrological Processes, 38(7): e15223; doi: 10.1002/hyp.15223
Mullet J.E. (2017) High-biomass C4 grasses—Filling the yield gap. Plant Science, 261: 10–17; doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.05.015
Nath C.P., Singh R.G., Choudhary V.K., Datta D., Nandan R., Singh S.S. (2024) Challenges and alternatives of herbicide-based weed management. Agronomy, 14(1): 126; doi: 10.3390/agronomy14010126
Olson S.N., Ritter K., Rooney W., Kemanian A., McCarl B.A., Zhang Y., Mullet J. (2012) High biomass yield energy sorghum: Developing a genetic model for C4 grass bioenergy crops. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 6(6): 640–655; doi: 10.1002/bbb.1357
Panicker A. (2025) Agriculture and climate change: Challenges ahead. Educohack Press.
Pretty J., Bharucha Z.P. (2014) Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems. Annals of Botany, 114(8): 1571–1596; doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu205
Punia H., Tokas J., Malik A., Satpal Rani A., Gupta P., Kumar S. (2020). Solar radiation and nitrogen use efficiency for sustainable agriculture. In: Resources Use Efficiency in Agriculture, pp. 177–212. Springer Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-6953-1_6
Raseduzzaman M., Gaudel G., Ali M.R., Timilsina A., Bizimana F., Aluoch S.O., Hu C. (2024) Cereal-legume mixed residue addition increases yield and reduces soil greenhouse gas emissions from fertilized winter wheat in the North China Plain. Agronomy, 14(6): 1167; doi: 10.3390/agronomy14061167
Reich P.B., Bermudez R., Montgomery R.A., Rich R.L., Rice K.E., Hobbie S.E., Stefanski A. (2022) Even modest climate change may lead to major transitions in boreal forests. Nature, 608(7923): 540–545; doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05070-7
Schutzbach M., Miehe R., Sauer A. (2025) Simplifying life cycle assessment: Basic considerations for approximating product carbon footprints based on corporate carbon footprints. Ecological Indicators, 176: 113710; doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113710
Sevenster M., Luo Z., Eady S., Grant T. (2020) Including long-term soil organic carbon changes in life cycle assessment of agricultural products. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25(7): 1231–1241; doi: 10.1007/s11367-019-01679-5
Sharma P. (2025) Modeling nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions at different spatial and temporal scales Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
Shi W., Tao F., Zhang Z. (2013) A review on statistical models for identifying climate contributions to crop yields. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 23(3): 567–576; doi: 10.1007/s11442-013-1039-5
Siddique I.A., Grados D., Chen J., Lærke P.E., Jørgensen U. (2023) Soil organic carbon stock change following perennialization: A meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 43(5): 58; doi: 10.1007/s13593-023-00896-2
Singh N. (2025) Perenniality impacts on soil physical and hydraulic properties and ecosystem services: A review. Sustainability, 17(24): 10988; doi: 10.3390/su172410988
Toromade A.S., Soyombo D.A., Kupa E., Ijomah T.I. (2024) Reviewing the impact of climate change on global food security: Challenges and solutions. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(7): 1403–1416; doi: 10.51594/ijarss.v6i7.1331
Ume C., Kalu U.F., Ezeibe A.B.C., Ume C.S., Ugwuoke C.O., Onah O., Joseph D.C. (2025) Critical perspectives on the use of methanotrophs in rice farming: Advances in microbial climate mitigation. Cleaner Food Systems, 2: 100005; doi: 10.1016/j.clfs.2025.100005
Wakjira M.T., Peleg N., Six J., Molnar P. (2025) Green water availability and water-limited crop yields under a changing climate in Ethiopia. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 29(4): 863–886; doi: 10.5194/hess-29-863-2025
Wang F., Arora C., Liu Y., Huang K., Tantithamthavorn C., Aleti A., Lo D. (2025) Multi-modal requirements data-based acceptance criteria generation using LLMs. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2508.06888;
Yang Y., Jin Z., Mueller N.D., Driscoll A.W., Hernandez R.R., Grodsky S.M., Lobell D.B. (2023) Sustainable irrigation and climate feedback. Nature Food, 4(8): 654–663; doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00796-0
Zhang J., Zhu Z., Hao H. (2023) The effects of climate variation and anthropogenic activity on karst spring discharge based on the wavelet coherence analysis and the multivariate statistical approach. Sustainability, 15(11): 8798; doi: 10.3390/su15118798
Zhou J., Shao G., Liu E., Liu Q., Yan C., Alharbi S.A., Kuzyakov Y. (2025) Climate warming and agronomic practice interactively alter soil carbon stock in dry farmland in China. Communications Earth & Environment, 6(1): 788; doi: 10.1038/s43247-025-01862-5
Zong M., Yang X., Li S., Manevski K., Jiaduo M., Zhou S., Abalos D. (2025) Mismatch between soil nitrate and cumulative crop nitrogen uptake shape stage-specific N₂O emissions with legume cover crops under nitrogen reduction in dryland wheat systems. Field Crops Research, 333: 110110; doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110110
Received: March 06, 2026; Reviewed: May 23, 2026; Accepted: June 05, 2026
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62088/timbb/10.1.4Keywords:
Sorghum, carbon footprint, yield-scaled emissions, agronomic intensification, life cycle assessment, biomass production, sustainable agriculture
Sajjad Z. (2026). Carbon footprint-yield relationships in sorghum as influenced by agronomic input intensity. TIMBB, 10 (2), 28-40.